Americas Program

Americas UPDATER
Vol. 6, No. 1 | January 10, 2008
available online at http://americas.irc-online.org/updater/4885

“A New World of Citizen Action, Analysis, and Policy Options”
http://www.americaspolicy.org/

New Content from the Americas Program

Why Bolivia Matters | This Week in the Americas by Laura Carlsen
Apaches Rise to Defend Homelands from Homeland Security | Investigative Article by Brenda Norrell
Losing the War of Ideas, Again | Commentary by Tom Barry
Fourteen Years of NAFTA and the Tortilla Crisis | Special Report by Ana de Ita

This Week in the Americas

Why Bolivia Matters
By Laura Carlsen

Bolivia today is an open laboratory. It might seem an unlikely stage for such an ambitious experiment: a landlocked nation of scarcely nine million with strong vestiges of colonial rule and the continent's highest poverty rate. Yet the effort to use the state to retake and redistribute resources ceded to private economic interests under globalization, to enfranchise indigenous populations, to narrow the appalling gap between the haves and have-nots of our era deserves a chance and will no doubt provide lessons for the rest of the world.

The response of the Bush administration to the Morales government has been hostile but guarded. U.S. Agency for International Development has moved to directly fund projects in opposition regions to strengthen resistance to the policies of Morales' party, the Movement for Socialism (MAS), as part of its "democracy-building" program.

Laura Carlsen (lcarlsen(a)ciponline.org) is director of the Americas Policy Program (www.americaspolicy.org) at the Center for International Policy in Mexico City, where she has been a writer and political analyst for two decades.

See new article online at:
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/4876

 

New from the Americas Policy Program

Apaches Rise to Defend Homelands from Homeland Security
By Brenda Norrell

Apache land owners on the Rio Grande told Homeland Security to halt the seizure of their lands for the U.S.-Mexico border wall on Jan. 7, 2008. It was the same day that a 30-day notice from Homeland Security expired with the threat of land seizures by eminent domain to build the U.S.-Mexico border wall.

Apaches at the Texas border have formed a national working group coalition of supporters, attorneys, and fellow Apaches and other indigenous peoples to resist the seizure of their lands, the desecration of their sacred places, and the militarization of their communities. In solidarity, the network opposes the seizure of private lands by Homeland Security by way of eminent domain, the militarization of the border, and construction of the border wall.

Brenda Norrell is a freelance writer and Americas Policy Program border analyst, www.americaspolicy.org. Her blog can be found at http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com/.

See new article online at:
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/4884

 

Losing the War of Ideas, Again
By Tom Barry

In the war of ideas over immigration, liberals are in disarray. Anti-immigration advocates have created the ideological frameworks—security, rule of law, nationalism—that now frame the raging immigration debate. Meanwhile, immigration advocates find that their own humanitarian, economic, and historical arguments supporting liberal immigration flows have little resonance in the public debate.

Tom Barry is a senior analyst with the Americas Policy Program (www.americaspolicy.org) at the Center for International Policy.

See new article online at:
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/4823

 

Fourteen Years of NAFTA and the Tortilla Crisis
By Ana de Ita

In January 2008, agricultural trade between Mexico, the United States, and Canada will become completely free, with the end of the implementation period of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

During this last year of NAFTA's transition period, multinationals that control the basic commodities market are showcasing their monopolistic capacities and acting against producer and consumer interests. The tortilla crisis shows that one of the NAFTA's basic assumptions—that it benefits consumers, even if it sacrifices farmers—is a macabre fallacy.

Ana de Ita is a researcher at the Centro de Estudios para el Cambio en el Campo Mexicano (Ceccam) and Americas Policy Program analyst at www.americaspolicy.org. This article was originally published by GRAIN with the support from the Evangelischer Entwicklungsdienst (EED).

See new article online at:
http://americas.irc-online.org/am/4879

 

 

If you would like to reproduce our articles for free, please cite the source, and let us know at americas@ciponline.org. We also welcome comments about our materials.

If you would like to unsubscribe, click on the link below that says "Update Profile/Unsubscribe". If you would like to subscribe for the first time to our multitude of topical lists, please go to http://app.streamsend.com/public/iKs8/Mr1/subscribe.

The Americas Program is a fiscally sponsored program of the
Center for International Policy
http://www.ciponline.org/
Email: americas@ciponline.org
Tel. in Mexico: (52 55) 5324-1201, U.S. phone: (202) 536-2649

Donations can be mailed to: (please specify Americas Program)

Center for International Policy
1717 Massachussets NW, Suite 801
Washington, DC 20036

Or by visiting the site: https://app.etapestry.com/hosted/CenterforInternationalPolic/OnlineGiving.html